Search for: "JONES v. WORLD PUBLISHING COMPANY"
Results 141 - 160
of 209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:32 pm
The Human Rights Commission also announces — rather triumphantly, I think — that it does not matter that Encyclopedia Dramatica is hosted and written in the United States, because Australian law, as reflected in Dow Jones v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
In addition to the “threshold of seriousness”, the court can be asked to decide whether there is a “real and substantial tort” and, if there is not, to strike the claim out as an abuse: Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:19 am
Lawyers for KBR, who had sought to force Jones' complaint into arbitration as called for by her employment contract, have withdrawn the company's petition for high court review. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
Conglomerate Blog reports that petitioners in Jones v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Attleboro, MA; Joseph Russo, President) Auto World Collision Inc. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Spillane, that Proctor intended to publish her name. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Spillane, that Proctor intended to publish her name. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
” Webb v Jones [2021] EWHC 1618 In Webb, the Defendant issued an application for an order that the particulars of claim be struck out in [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:58 pm
Jones, as MyJr to pass that along to you. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:53 pm
If you publish one post a week, announcing “truk acident on I-95! [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 01445-20 Robertson v Telegraph.co.uk, 1Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 00527-20 Ekins-Daukes v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation Last Week in the Courts On 1 July 2020 Mr Justice Nicklin handed down judgement in Piepenbrock v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 1708 (QB) regarding… [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 6:15 am
” You can then go on: “In the decision, Smith v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Part 1 was published on 5 November 2010. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
Right to Privacy in a Posthuman World, Mritunjay Kumar, University of Delhi. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
The company has provided legal support to those interviewed today“. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 am
(The Supreme Court in fact rejected a rule of personal liability for retaliation in Jones v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
The original is published here: http://verdict.justia.com/2012/02/13/sopa-and-the-future-of-internet-governance. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
The give-us-the-data-and-we’ll-organise-the-world crowd also display a touching naïvety when it comes to the law. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
Supreme Court, in one of its most historical decisions, Marbury v. [read post]
