Search for: "James v. Cox" Results 141 - 160 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2018, 6:28 pm by Michael Lowe
Cox submitted over $3.9M in medical insurance claims for treatment allegedly provided by licensed medical providers. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 7:20 am by Tessa Shepperson
July I learn of a consumer group looking to take action on illegal agents fees to tenants, the Supreme Court give their decision in the case of Kumarasamy v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm by Barbara McQuade
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account approval… [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:24 am by Mandelman
Warren, you’ll be over by me instead… “But… I was Chief Economist… ” I know you were, Simon, but I’ve got you sitting with James Kwak… “Oh come on… I’m always stuck sitting with him… this is so not fair…” Look, Simon… stage a quiet coup, would you please? [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am by Jack Goldsmith
I argued earlier this month that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report misapplied the presidential clear statement rule and improperly exposed many of President Trump’s actions in response to the Russia investigation to potential criminal liability. [read post]