Search for: "James v. Scott*" Results 141 - 160 of 1,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2014, 1:42 am by Jocelyn Hutton
  The second two appeals, R (Haney) v The Secretary of State for Justice and R (Kaiyam) v The Secretary of State for Justice will decide whether a delay in transferring the appellants to open prisons violated their rights under ECHR, arts 5 and 14 and whether the Court should depart from the precedent in R (James & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKHL 22 and R (Clift & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL… [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Chief Cox designated Detectives Scott Alston, Michael McEwan and James Surdoval to perform such police patrol duties.* As a result, these detectives "work[ed] part of [their] normal work week, during [their] normal work hours, in uniform on patrol. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
At the ABA Journal, Terry Carter and James Podgers report on how the Court’s 2009 decision in Caperton v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:53 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 30 October 2013 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v James, R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, and In the matter of “The Alexandros T” (Nos. 1, 2 and 3. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 1:10 pm
In the National Law Journal, Marcia Coyle reports here at Law.com on Hein v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
The nation’s highest court ruled the execution of an inmate with an intellectual disability violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unjust punishments” in the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
The nation’s highest court ruled the execution of an inmate with an intellectual disability violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unjust punishments” in the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
The nation’s highest court ruled the execution of an inmate with an intellectual disability violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unjust punishments” in the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
  In a guest opinion column for the Seattle Times, James Bopp, Jr. and Scott F. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]