Search for: "Johnston, Application of"
Results 141 - 160
of 380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 6:02 am
Johnston of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:16 pm
Johnston, No. 143067-8, the Court remanded the case to the Court of Appeals as on leave granted. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 2:00 am
Under the agreement, the office will operate a modified application process. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
She concluded neither application of the law applied here.The Surrey Six trial is expected to be a complex, large trial. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
David Johnston QC submits that he has, on a counsel to counsel basis, offered Kenny McBrearty QC a chance to see the Respondents’ Note of Argument. 1554: David Johnston QC submits that there are a wide range of views on the manner in which the country leaves the EU. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:23 am
Johnstone and Canadian National Railway v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:06 am
How Long Will the VA Take to Approve Your PACT Act Application? [read post]
13 May 2014, 4:15 pm
This is the decision I would like to address, since the other decision is simply a further example of an application of the Johnstone decision by the FCA. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Radiation Johnston v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:57 am
42,270 applications, or a 6.5 % increase compared to 2010. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:55 am
Johnston’s article in Small Business Computing.com entitled “Microsoft Launches Office 365 for SMB Markets” and its companion article in Small Business Computing.com entitled “Is a Low-cost Calling Plan in the Works for Office 365” comes to save the day. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 7:29 pm
Takeaway: The applicants appealed subject-matter eligibility rejections made under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 7:29 pm
Takeaway: The applicants appealed subject-matter eligibility rejections made under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Reg 8(2) being the provision that if, in reaching a s.202 Housing Act 1996 review decision:If the reviewer considers that there is a deficiency or irregularity in the original decision, or in the manner in which it was made, but is minded nonetheless to make a decision which is against the interests of the applicant on one or more issues, the reviewer shall notify the applicant—(a) that the reviewer is so minded and the reasons why; and(b) that the applicant, or… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Reg 8(2) being the provision that if, in reaching a s.202 Housing Act 1996 review decision:If the reviewer considers that there is a deficiency or irregularity in the original decision, or in the manner in which it was made, but is minded nonetheless to make a decision which is against the interests of the applicant on one or more issues, the reviewer shall notify the applicant—(a) that the reviewer is so minded and the reasons why; and(b) that the applicant, or… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:51 am
Justice Johnston decided that the best resolution would be to review the transcripts and address the recalling of witnesses on an individual basis. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:30 pm
– Washington, DC attorney Angelle Smith of Covington on their blog, InsidePoliticalLaw Cross-Border Custody Disputes and the Application of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act – Denver lawyer Steven Johnston of Pryor Johnson Carney Karr Nixon on his blog, Colorado Family Law Matters More on Fail-Safe Classes and Structural Flaws- Northside Chiropractic Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
If you have any questions regarding the Speak Out Act or nondisclosure or non-disparagement provisions, contact Liz Johnston or another member of Verrill’s Employment & Labor Group. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 7:51 pm
Johnston, a lawyer for the group called Preserve Palm Beach, said, referring to Mr. [read post]
