Search for: "KERR v. JONES"
Results 141 - 160
of 370
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2014, 9:57 pm
A federal trial judge in California has handed down an opinion, Jones v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:50 pm
Jones and Riley v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:56 am
Jones, 565 U. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
See Ontario v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
Jones and the D.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:32 pm
” What about Smith v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
“Since 1967, when it decided Katz v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:37 am
At the WaPo Conspiracy, Orin Kerr wrote about a decision by Judge B. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 3:33 pm
Jones, 132 U.S. 945, 957 (2012) (Sotomayor, J., concurring). [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:50 am
”); Oliver v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:37 pm
Jones–A Case Of Sound And Fury Herding Katz: GPS Tracking And Society’s Expectations Of Privacy In The 21st Century United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012)”. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 9:48 am
In Jones v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
Justice Sotomayor’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:55 pm
Jones. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage in that action too intensively and… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
On the Fourth Amendment, Judge Pauley’s opinion also counsels a salutary caution on the premature burial of Smith v. [read post]