Search for: "Keen v. Keen"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,336
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2021, 2:18 am
Solicitors Robin Stewart and Nikki Basin of Anthony Gold consider the case of Global 100 Ltd v Laleva [2021]. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 7:39 am
Kim v. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 7:54 am
Supreme Court decision (Brady v. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
” (C) Impact on the Common Law In your time as a judge, you have been keen to introduce the principle of good faith into English contract law, however, it is fair to say that the law has yet to reach a stage of settled clarity. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 1:30 am
The Family Court is very keen to see parents reaching a compromise. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 4:30 am
The first thing to point out is that whilst Lord Leggatt was keen to point out that the wording of the GDPR was of no assistance to the court in reaching its decision concerning the old law under the DPA 1998, the reasoning applies in full to the new regime. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 1:15 pm
There is no indication that Judge Koh’s nomination to the Ninth Circuit is in jeopardy, but it is noteworthy, and at least somewhat unusual, numerous Senators asked Judge Koh virtually the same questions regarding her decision in FTC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 6:01 pm
No doubt both insureds and insurers are keen to get some final answers before the year is out. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Williams v Parmar & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER) (2021) UKUT 244 (LC) We knew that the Upper Tribunal has been itching to get an appeal on the approach to the assessment of the amount of a rent repayment order, ever since Ficcara v James, apparently being keen to make the point that ‘the full rent’ was not a starting point in the criminal sentencing sense, as it could not go up beyond that according to landlord conduct. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statement since our last Round Up: 04322-21 Ruayrungruang v The Sunday Telegraph, 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 04302-21 Lovatt v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03315-21 Ruayrungruang v The Daily Telegraph, 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 00798-21 Reynolds v The Daily Telegraph, 1… [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am
Doubt was cast upon this practice in early 2021 in a CMC in Sandoz v BMS[7][2021] EWHC 393 (Pat) (Ch) and Teva v BMS where Mellor J observed that the practice of listing the trial before the CMC might well be doing things the wrong way round , and lead to parties jumping the queue to get their trial listed whilst others completed their pre-CMC formalities. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am
” In a case law context, the five principles governing estoppel by convention were outlined in the decision of Briggs J in Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Benchdollar [2009] EWHC 1310 (Ch) (“Benchdollar”). [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 7:03 pm
In one case of Debra H. v Janice R, the Court of Appeals confirmed that “biological strangers” who had not adopted a child would not be able to proceed in court for the cases of custody and visitation. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm
Not because Democrats are keen to hike taxes to pay for their spending in the coming reconciliation bill. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:58 am
The e-commerce phenom attaches itself to an array of woke causes but remains a wonderfully hard-nosed commercial enterprise, keen to be fully compensated for the enormous value it delivers. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction What Is the Tax Gap and What Proposals Are Available? [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 3:53 am
Keene, rejected the first two arguments but accepted the third. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
PCAOB, Seila Law v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm
Keene, 481 U. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 12:21 pm
That happened in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
