Search for: "LG ELECTRONICS, INC."
Results 141 - 160
of 484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm
In affirming the final written decision, the appellate court found that ZTE’s lack of adversarial nature in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings allowed LG Electronics, a joined party that was otherwise time-barred, to properly oppose CyWee’s motion to amend patent claims. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm
In affirming the final written decision, the appellate court found that ZTE’s lack of adversarial nature in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings allowed LG Electronics, a joined party that was otherwise time-barred, to properly oppose CyWee’s motion to amend patent claims. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:52 pm
Flashpoint’s complaint originally named Respondents Nokia Corp. and Nokia, Inc.; Research in Motion Ltd. and Research in Motion Corp.; HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.; LG Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers, LG Electronics USA, Inc. and LG Electronics MobileComm USA, Inc. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:25 pm
The Complainant in this investigation is LG Electronics, Inc. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 9:11 am
LG Electronics (Supreme Court 2007) The Korean chaebol LG licensed a set of patents to Intel. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:37 pm
The top spot was taken by last year’s runner-up, South Korea’s LG Electronics, which filed 251 new Australian standard patent applications, up from 236 in 2020. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:07 pm
LG Electronics, Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 4:04 am
In re LG Electronics Inc., Serial No. 88055289 (August 26, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin).Trademark Rule 2.41(a) provides that an applicant’s “ownership of one or more active prior registrations on the Principal Register . . . of the same mark may be accepted as prima facie evidence of distinctiveness if the goods or services are sufficiently similar to the goods and services in the application. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:55 am
In the Orders, ALJ Luckern denied Respondents Research In Motion, Ltd., Research In Motion Corporation, Nokia Corp., Nokia Inc., HTC America, Inc., LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 6:46 am
LG Electronics USA, Inc., 2016 WL 6648751 (D. [read post]
Chief Judge Sleet construes claim terms relating to refrigerator ice bin and dispenser technologies.
30 Jul 2012, 8:48 am
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 12:54 pm
The case arises out of a lawsuit brought by LG Electronics, Inc., et al. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 1:51 pm
Though the district court in this case relied on the co-pending case against Lyft, Inc. as well as Bumble, both of those litigations involve entirely different underlying functionality and the Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. and LG Electronics Inc. et al. litigations have now been directed to be transferred to Northern California. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:13 am
LG Electronics, Inc., Case No. 15-4431 (SRC) (D.N.J. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:47 am
LG Electronics v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
Last year LG Electronics sued Whirlpool for selling refrigerators that infringe a series of LG patents. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
Last year LG Electronics sued Whirlpool for selling refrigerators that infringe a series of LG patents. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:59 pm
By Michael Borella -- As patent-eligibility stands in 2018, it can be difficult to determine whether a graphical user interface (GUI) with an innovative layout and/or functionality meets the requirements of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:15 pm
LG Electronics Inc., 21-1967, — F.4th — (Fed. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:15 am
LG Electronics, Inc. was a watershed moment. [read post]
