Search for: "Lacks v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 141 - 160
of 445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2009, 11:58 pm
Abraham v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:14 am
R (Derry) v Commissioners for HMRC was heard on 12 December 2018. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:35 pm
Held: the construction of the Coroners Act 1988, r 17 adopted by the coroner was correct. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:46 pm
The district court allowed Correct the Record and Hillary for America to intervene as defendants and dismissed the case for lack of informational standing. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Dept. of Corrections).......................................15Trial Tr., Timberlake v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:29 am
From Kuck v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am
R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
Cir. 1998), confirms the correctness of the PTO’sposition here. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
The Information Commissioner (who has a statutory duty to review Google’s decisions following a request by a data subject) was granted permission to intervene in the proceedings. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:01 am
by Dennis Crouch Techtronic Indus. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
Although I sympathize with the petition, I believe the Federal Circuit got the statutory interpretation correct. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 10:53 am
But this lack of unanimity in the moment of political battle is hardly dispositive on the correct constitutional understanding of the matter. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:14 pm
The decision in Anderson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:06 am
Latest Regulatory Decisions Latest decisions of the Scottish Information Commissioner: Latest Decision Notices from the Information Commissioner’s Office: Latest decisions of the First-tier Tribunal, General Regulatory Chamber [Information Rights] Peter Dun v IC EA/2010/0060: FOI Act 2000, s 40 (personal data). [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
18 May 2012, 4:49 am
CIR v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Senate v. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 6:48 pm
Reg. 82/20 of the Act in Hudson’s Bay Company ULC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
CIR Commissioner of Internal Revenue 08a0101p.06 AmeriCredit Fin Serv v. [read post]
