Search for: "Lady v. Smith" Results 141 - 160 of 235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 6:12 pm by Jim Walker
The seminal case involving the responsibility of cruise lines in dispensing alcohol is a 2004 case here in Miami called Hall v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 10:49 am by thenambypamby
Acme Corporation case and I heard a case get called that sounded familiar “Smith v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:57 am by admin
Smith   Wheeling gulls spin and glide You’ve got no place to hide ‘Cause you don’t need one – Crosby Stills and Nash, Lee Shore   Some cases are born momentous (NFIB v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:39 am by John Elwood
  One moved out: The Court denied without recorded dissent in two-time relist Smith v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
In one memorable exchange, Smith was asked what a buttplug was. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:48 am by Sam Morris, Olswang LLP
The appeal was heard and will be considered by Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 4:02 am by Libby Payne, Olswang LLP
Lady Smith also found that the Tribunal had fallen into error in light of ERA 1996, s 204. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix
In the Privy Council Samuel Robie v The Queen (Jamaica) will be heard on Tuesday 8 November by Lords Kerr, Clarke and Wilson, Dame Heather Hallett and Dame Janet Smith. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:13 am
However, even though such an exception would probably prevent the removal of videos such as ‘Newport’, it is unclear how it would help in the GaGa v Goo Goo parody case, where the former claimed trade mark infringement rather than copyright infringement. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:45 am by admin
   “This is something that could be powerful,” said Abhijit V. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog  In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as… [read post]