Search for: "Law v. International Union of Operating Engineers"
Results 141 - 160
of 269
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
However, many commentators thought that such injunctions in relation to future infringement applied only to to intellectual property claims, as provided for specifically in statute, until the recent case of Cartier International and Others v BskyB and others ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch)). [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
These included discussion of: the impact of mass surveillance; developments in the U.S. on intelligence reform efforts; legal framework and privacy principles; international transfers of data, both for governmental and commercial purposes; need for data protection reform in the European Union; efforts to improve European Union-based IT and cloud industries; and principles that should govern democratic oversight of intelligence services. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:26 am
Crossley, “Case Law, Hamburg District Court: Max Mosley v Google Inc”, online: Inforrm’s Blog”. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm
The Directive does not require proof of pecuniary damage, but it was held in Johnson –v- Medical Defence Union that the DPA does.) [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:07 pm
Even though he recognizes the superiority of European Union law, he indicates that he favors some kind of “concurrent protection of fundamental rights” that would establish a leeway for national courts. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
See, Animal Welfare International Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment in Case C-435/12 ACI Adam BV and Others v Stichting de Thuiskopie, Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding deciding that "The amount of the levy payable for making private copies of a protected work may not take unlawful reproductions into account. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 6:40 am
” The International Union of Operating Engineers Local 150 had mounted a two-pronged legal challenge to the statute in federal and state court. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
The course has also expanded from its original narrow and technical focus, to a broader focus on principles and the use of language and logic to build and operate a system of law. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
And the United States Navy was ahead of Selikoff in terms of detailing the difficulty in controlling confined-space asbestos lagging operations onboard ships, and the consequent asbestosis hazards[5]. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
” Prosecutor v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 11:10 am
Although I don’t normally cover international topics in my Internet Law course, I felt I had to acknowledge the significance of this event. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:34 am
Klinger v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:49 am
Judge Chin of the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals had called Aereo’s service “a Rube Goldberg-like contrivance, over-engineered in an attempt to avoid the reach of the Copyright Act and to take advantage of a perceived loophole in the law. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm
There is a degree of international recognition that the operators of search engines should put in place such a system (which could obviously either be on a voluntary basis or put upon a statutory footing) to take account of legitimate complaints about legally objectionable material. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:21 am
The Larson case involves the indictment of members of the International Union of Operating Engineers under the RICO law, which is the same law used to indict the Ironworkers. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:17 pm
Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers that “an appeal was untimely because an unresolved issue of contractual attorneys' fees did not prevent judgment on the merits from being final for purposes of” the appellate clock. [read post]
