Search for: "Leviness v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 2,108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
States which use separate (rather than combined) reporting and nevertheless seek to tax GILTI face a serious constitutional challenge, particularly under the precedent of Kraft v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:40 pm
by Paul Levy The Ninth Circuit has retracted some of the dangerous dictum in its recent decision in Barnes v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 11:44 am by Kevin Kaufman
The relatively recent expansion of sports betting in the U.S. is a result of the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:27 am by Scott Tippett
Though the result was preordained, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its decision in FTC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rev. 1149**As to state law and patents-->To support this position, the court looked to Jim Arnold Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 10:24 am by Heather Wallace
The state high court’s August 22 decision not to review the case leaves unchanged the April 14 appeals court ruling in Vergara v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Allard Knook
Similarly, the originally private nature of the resources did not prevent them being regarded as State resources within the meaning of Art. 87(1) EC (see, to that effect, Case T‑358/94 Air France v Commission [1996]).In accordance with the case-law, the mere fact that a subsidy scheme benefiting certain economic operators in a given sector was wholly or partially financed by contributions imposed by the public authority and levied on the undertakings concerned was… [read post]
25 May 2009, 11:25 am by Agrilawyer
Varieties protected by Plant Variety Protection (PVP) Title V can be sold only as a class of certified seed as will be designated by the individual states. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by Steven Boutwell
  Thus, even though the due process or Commerce Clause standards may not be identical or coterminous, when considering whether a state may levy a tax there are significant parallels between the two standards. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 2:00 am by NCC Staff
The Revenue Act of 1864 did survive a later Supreme Court challenge, when in Springer v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 9:29 pm by Sme
Utah State Charter School Board (10th Cir., December 16, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the Board because its members were entitled to qualified immunity)Discrimination/Retaliation*Jackson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
It is clear(er) that this is to be intended as actual, rather than potential harm [this conclusion also appears supported further by what is stated at paras 48 and 49, as well as 70]. [read post]