Search for: "Levinson v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm by Schachtman
It is unprecedented in 49 prior trials and depositions where I have testified, in federal and state courts all over the United States, including many cases in Texas. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
Evans’s understanding of equality in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:07 am by Tom Webley
On June 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Halliburton Co., et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Court held that a provision of the federal bank fraud statute which makes it a crime to “knowingly execut[e] a scheme . . . to obtain” property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank “by means of false or fraudulent pretenses” does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am by Broc Romanek
We have started posting the hordes of memos in our “Securities Litigation” Practice Area, but here’s analysis from Skadden: The Supreme Court of the United States today in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The case was closely watched because its outcome had the potential to transform securities class action litigation in the United States. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:00 am by Brian Schmidt
The United States of America – Keep the Presumption Intact; Meritorious Private Securities Fraud Cases Complement Criminal Prosecutions and Civil Enforcement Actions. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:40 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-632Issue: Whether forensic pathology reports are testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:32 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently denied certification of a putative securities law class after finding that plaintiff failed to put forth actual facts showing adequacy and predominance, as required to satisfy the “stringent standards” of Rule 23 pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:52 am by John Stigi
Mar. 19, 2014), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Boyle, J.) denied lead plaintiff’s class certification motion in a consolidated action alleging claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court could potentially change the securities class action litigation landscape in the United States, as the Court considers whether or not to dump the fraud on the market theory. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:52 am by Anushila Shaw
  As discussed in previous blog posts, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider Petitioner Halliburton’s argument to modify or overturn the fraud-on-the market presumption that the Court first articulated more than a quarter century ago in Basic  v. [read post]