Search for: "Li v. O"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,053
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2022, 6:04 am
Bar Assoc. v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection Google announced new privacy measures during its I/O 2022 developer conference designed to give users more control over how their data is used. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am
Secretary of State Antony Blinken has told his Ukrainian counterpart that this progress — marked by Kyiv Embassy charge d’affaires Kristina Kvien’s visit yesterday to commemorate V-E Day — is a testament to Ukraine’s success and Moscow’s failure in the early phase of the war. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:18 am
“Among the litany of lies Russia has spread about its war in Ukraine, disinformation that Ukraine is developing biological weapons is particularly insidious,” the European External Action Service said in a translated tweet originally posted in Chinese. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 12:12 am
De ahí deriva que nos encontramos con una potestad de la Administración con amplio margen de decisión aunque ello no quiere decir que sea una potestad discrecional o libérrima sino que estamos ante una potestad reglada sujeta a la verificación de los hechos determinantes y límites legales, ya que la Administración deberá contemplar dos limites reglados específicos (la preexistencia de los supuestos de hecho y que no existe… [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
On 30 March 2022 there was an application in the case of Watkins -v- Mackle. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The Second Circuit therefore certified a question to this Court: "Does the 'special duty' requirement—that, to sustain liability in negligence against a municipality, the plaintiff must show that the duty breached is greater than that owed to the public generally—apply to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence, or does it apply only when the municipality's negligence lies in its failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury inflicted other… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The Second Circuit therefore certified a question to this Court: "Does the 'special duty' requirement—that, to sustain liability in negligence against a municipality, the plaintiff must show that the duty breached is greater than that owed to the public generally—apply to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence, or does it apply only when the municipality's negligence lies in its failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury inflicted other… [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:55 pm
AL PERSONAL DEL MODULO INTEGRADO DEL PODER JUDICIAL URUBAMBA.No tengo palabras para expresarles cuánto lamento haberlo ofendido por un error exclusivamente de mi responsabilida pord de no encontré los adjuntos porque en lugar de consultar mi Casilla "SINOE", la información la tomé del enlace SEGUIMIENTO DE EXPEDIENTES, dónde NO pueden estar los acompañados a los escritos respectivos.Paralelamente, me abordo un joven con la Requisitoria contra… [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 12:53 pm
United States and Kahn v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:44 am
” The Appellate Division affirmed in all respects in Quattro Parent LLC v Rakib, 181 AD3d 518 [1st Dept 2020]. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 4:57 pm
South AfricaQwelane v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 2:10 pm
Protestors were then filmed dancing on top of the Tomb of the Unknown Solder which lies in front of the memorial. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Van Orden v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 10:28 am
En cas de non-conformité subséquente, des pénalités de plus en plus sévères s’appliqueront. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 2:43 pm
” Thiel v. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 6:25 am
Warth) or not merely “abstract” (O’Shea v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 7:34 pm
Desde La Habana, el sacerdote de Ifá, Víctor Betancourt, dijo que la oficialista Asociación Cultural Yoruba rompió con los acuerdos establecidos desde 2016 y este año hicieron la ceremonia "a puerta cerrada, sin convocar a nadie de la comisión". [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
