Search for: "Light v. Lang"
Results 141 - 160
of 194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2016, 6:49 am
Affirming summary judgment, the First Circuit also refused to reinstate her retaliation claim since she failed to refute Wal-Mart’s assertion that it fired her almost two years later because she failed to submit medical papers to support her need for medical leave for an unrelated arm injury (Lang v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:44 am
Lilly v Genentech provided Arnold J will the opportunity to consider this issue in the context of two claims of Genentech’s patent to IL-17A/F antibodies. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 12:50 am
For our purposes the key German dispute is Nokia v Daimler before the District Court of Mannheim (case ID 2 O 34/19). [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:22 am
In this regard, in its judgment of 12 December 2013 (case C-493/12, Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences), the CJEU made the following observations: “30. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:05 pm
As the Supreme Court wrote in Lange v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:00 am
Counsel Comments: Comments provided by Georgialee Lang, Counsel for the Appellant: Sampley v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Before Justices Lang and Brown[1]. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:38 am
It is therefore hardly surprising, especially in light of the often Delphic language used by the CJEU in its rulings, that parties will fight hard to argue each and every point of possible ambiguity. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:14 pm
Lawdiva aka Georgialee Lang [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Multiple parallel cases This was an interesting feature of the Ocado v AutoStore litigation. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
The judgment in Levitt v Felton [pdf] was handed down by the Michigan Trial Court on 19 February 2015. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm
T.M.H., Appellant, v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:08 am
For example, in Rosalba Alassini v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Lang, for appellants-respondents Hochul et al. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Lang, for appellants-respondents Hochul et al. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:16 am
Regarding the scope of the patent, the Judge relied on Article 69 EPC – i.e. claims must be interpreted in the light of the description and drawings – and on its interpretation protocol. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm
In this article, Stone and Evans discuss the landmark rulings in Lange v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
Michael Lang, Opposition No. 91204122 (June 17, 2015) [not precedential]. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 2:10 am
GSK v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 10:39 am
Michael Lang, Opposition No. 91204122 (June 17, 2015) [not precedential]. [read post]
