Search for: "Little v. Walker" Results 141 - 160 of 538
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Rulings  IPSO has published a series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: 01582-17 Little v Mail on Sunday, breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) and no breach of Clause 2 (Privacy) 01717-18 Jones v Wrexham Leader, no breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) after investigation 02148-18 Young v dailyrecord.co.uk, no breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) after investigation 02200-18 Pswarayi v Swindon Advertiser, no breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) after investigation… [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO published one decision of the Complaints Committee: 19858-17 Walker v mirror.co.uk. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It makes it a little different but not a lot; not on tastiness or liking at all. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am by Jon Penney
Skepticism and assumptions about impactSkepticism about surveillance impacts like chilling effects is, as noted, is persistent with commentators like Stanford Law’s Michael Sklansky insisting there “little empirical support” for chilling effects associated with surveillance or Leslie Kendrick, of UVA Law, labeling the evidence supporting such claims “flimsy” and calling for more systematic research on point. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:19 am by Dave
  Astonishingly, or perhaps just boldly, though, he went on to criticise the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Berrisford, having been given some suasion by Southward Housing Co-Operative v Walker [2016] Ch 443 (our note). [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
We know surprisingly little about how performance standards work in practice. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
We know surprisingly little about how performance standards work in practice. [read post]