Search for: "Long v. AT & T Information Systems Inc" Results 141 - 160 of 1,382
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2022, 1:44 pm by Natalie Kirby
As long as the product didn't blow up in the purchaser's face (sometimes this was quite literal) the seller was in the clear. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
But welcome to the American federal system, where companies that do business with people who are in multiple states must comply with the laws of those multiple states. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Community members wouldn't be able to use the information about the lawsuit to update their judgments about the plaintiff. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm by Bennett Cyphers
” In other words, Fog’s service allows police to track people’s movements over long periods of time. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The data files are described as copies of components from election systems in Coffee County, Georgia, and Antrim County, Michigan. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch For our patent law course today, the students read the Justice O’Connor unanimous opinion in  Bonito Boats, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
See also OSCAR GANDY, THE PANOPTIC SORT: A POLITICAL ECONOMY OF PERSONAL INFORMATION (2021). 3 See, e.g., Press Release, Fed. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
“Grammatical Irregularities” Don’t Govern Operating Agreement’s Capital Call Provision  Chen v 697 Dekalb LLC, 2022 NY Slip Op 32418(U) [Sup Ct Kings County July 18, 2022]. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision in Omnicare,[7] so long as they are genuinely held and not misleading when considered in their full context. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
It initially sought to gain investor information and voting rights in the company but now is looking to bring a derivative action against Shell in the English High Court. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the court briefly discussed, but didn't resolve, the question whether § 922(g)(4) may be unconstitutional: In D.C. v. [read post]