Search for: "Long v. Arnold" Results 141 - 160 of 564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
The facts of Arnold v Britton neatly illustrate this. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 2:55 pm
  Works there for a long time.In 2014, she discovers that she herself has cancer. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:46 am
This is a reference from Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, on an appeal from the Trade Mark Registry. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
 Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v… [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:42 am
 One such case is Omega Engineering Incorporated v Omega S.A. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
In Case Nintendo v PC Box C-355/12 [Kat Posts here], the CJEU explained that Art 6 is to be interpreted broadly and "includes application of an access control or protection process, such as encryption, scrambling or other transformation of the work". [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Starting on January 9th, the parties pleaded their case revolving around the decade-long legal battle between Bouvier and Rybolovlev, and Sotheby’s alleged involvement. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Mary Ziegler on the Texas, the Supreme Court and Roe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:23 am
 Tobias is also letting us have a copy of an English translation of Kecofa v Lancôme. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignSupreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) is another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon  Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]