Search for: "Look v. Department of Corrections"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Like in Bantam Books v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:20 am
That's the rule in Anderson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 1:06 am
Thepanel departs from these requirements. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:00 am
See Schnabel v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:11 pm
What is most interesting about the Ohio Court of Appeals (5th District) decision from March 16 in City of Alliance v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 10:19 am
A Look Back at Hospice Audits and Prosecutions in 2020 — Are You Ready for 2021? [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
“Lawsplainer: How The Sixth Circuit Stood Up To Hecklers (And Cops)” [Popehat on Michigan case of Bible Believers v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 3:02 pm
The Justice Department has filed a petition for rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Photo credit: US Defense Department [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm
Kisor v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:28 pm
" The Justice Department is looking into what happened and what steps may now be taken, Ms. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:59 am
So far this term Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh have all been in the majority in all but one of the court’s 5-4 decisions (In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 1:38 pm
: For the criminal law prof: Winiarz v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 2:41 pm
Dep't of Taxation v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 2:17 pm
So you'd better look. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 7:50 pm
Martin v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am
Normal service looks to have been resumed following the Court of Appeal judgment in IPCom v Vodafone [2021] EWCA Civ 205, in which Arnold LJ reversed a first instance finding by Recorder Douglas Campbell QC that Vodafone was entitled to a defence of Crown use in respect of certain acts which infringed an IPCom patent, as well as providing some interesting commentary on the application of the de minimis infringement defence. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 10:31 pm
Now, if he did insist on presiding over a third Oracle v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm
v. [read post]
