Search for: "Lord v. State -"
Results 141 - 160
of 4,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
” Existing industry players, such as Rupert Murdoch, Lord Rothermere and Alex Springer have been touted as potential buyers, as well as sovereign wealth funds in Gulf States, such as Saudi Arabia. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:24 am
From Lord v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
For the first time in the ICC’s history, in September 2019 a Pre-Trial Chamber recognized charges of gender persecution in Prosecutor v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
The House of Lords clarified the “serious harm” test for defamation claims, stating that the claimant must prove that the publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to their reputation. [read post]
28 May 2023, 12:15 am
However, I understand the confusion and I thank the noble Lords who have raised these amendments. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:00 pm
In simple terms, the government cannot take your land and then decide later what to do with it without running afoul of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.Absent “urban blight,” or other exceptions which weren’t present here, the AD4 annulled the Town’s efforts to acquire the Mall property and awarded the owner its fees and costs.Not that’s a condemnation if… [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:30 pm
He explains that “growing up in New Haven, I never felt coerced, but nevertheless, I did not like it when we recited the Lord’s Prayer, Protestant version, in all these local elementary schools, which were loaded with Irish Catholic kids” (OI, v.2, 331). [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (“SLSC”) has identified a re-attempt by the Government to amend the Public Order Act 1986 to lower the threshold for police intervention in respect of protests that was already rejected in January 2023 in the Public Order Bill—now the Public Order Act 2023. [read post]
21 May 2023, 12:28 pm
United States. [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:42 am
Four cases in the House of Lords or Supreme Court’ at [17] ff. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 12:19 am
Ecclesiastical lawyers will perhaps be more familiar with Martin v Mackonochie, Law Reports, Privy Council Appeal, Cases, 1867-9, pp. 386 to 392, and Mackonochie v Lord Penzance (1881) 6 App Cas 424. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:52 am
George the Martyr Preston [4], in which Hodge Ch. stated: “[29]. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:34 am
On 28 April the Home Office updated its Fact Sheet on the Bill, which indicated those measures within the Act to commence on 3 May 2023, v infra. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
The focus of this post, however, is the legislation on the disposal of altars and fonts; in the instant case, the Chancellor stated: “Since the altar will have been dedicated to its sacramental role in the celebration of the Eucharist, or Lord’s Supper, it should not be profaned by any secular use which might result from its sale or disposal for any non-liturgical purpose. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
As Lord Burrows pointed out at [5], in the Christian Brothers case – Catholic Child Welfare Society & Ors v Various Claimants & The Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools & Ors [2012] UKSC 5 – Lord Phillips had said at [19] that the law of vicarious liability was “on the move”. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Rosenthal, United States District Court judge for the Southern District of Texas, and Reagan W. [read post]
