Search for: "Los Angeles v. Superior Court" Results 141 - 160 of 1,366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The law codified the ‘ABC Test’[1] which had been applied by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v Superior Court of Los Angeles ((2018) 4 Cal.5th 903). [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Los Angeles (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 368, and my 4/9/20 post on it can be found here. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:51 am by HRWatchdog
Superior Court of Los Angeles, 4 Cal. 5th 903 (2018) (Dynamex) that instead of the Borello test, employers should use the ABC test to determine proper classification. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 7:29 pm by Cannabis Law Group
The Los Angeles CANNABIS LAW Group represents growers, dispensaries, ancillary companies, patients, doctors and those facing marijuana charges. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 1:06 pm by admin
Novartis AG, California Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty., Transcript of Oral Argument on Post-Trial Motions, at 46 -47 (March 18, 2004) (Hon. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 5:06 am by Schachtman
Novartis AG, California Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty., Transcript of Oral Argument on Post-Trial Motions, at 46 -47 (March 18, 2004) (Hon. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Depp v NGN [2020] EWHC 2911 (QB)) on 2 November 2020. [read post]
Superior Court of Los Angeles, which created a “presumption that a worker who performs services for a hirer is an employee for purposes of claims for wages and benefits arising under wage orders issued by the Industrial Welfare Commission. [read post]