Search for: "M&C Wholesale" Results 141 - 160 of 203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
The recent disasters in Japan will likely send financial shockwaves across the P&C side of the insurance industry.A M Best reports that "Swiss Re is estimating claims costs of about US$1.2 billion, net of retrocession and before tax, from the March 11 earthquake and tsunami in Japan" and that AIG "expects to incur a pretax insurance loss of US$700 million for its nonlife subsidiary Chartis Inc. from the March 11 earthquake and tsunami. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 9:04 pm by Susan Mangiero
Beyond that, C-level leaders in the United States have a legal duty to their shareholders to create wealth (which is not necessarily the same thing as boosting the bottom line but that's a topic for another day). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court found willfulness: the defendants were a large-volume unauthorized reseller who knew they were buying and selling StriVectin well below what they knew to be its actual wholesale price. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:30 am by Gene Quinn
On Monday, December 13, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued a non-decision in the matter of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
 "I'm willing to live up to the law," he said, "but it would be difficult to do. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm by Kelly
ITC (Patently-O) District Court Utah: Failure to mark not attributed to licensor where licensee’s rights arise from ‘License that contains an apparently unlimited covenant not to sue’: Phillip M. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
App. 2007) (adopting Restatement Third §2(c) regarding warnings; “[a]bsent controlling Arizona law to the contrary, we generally follow the Restatement”); Southwest Pet Products, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:27 pm by pfriedman
Negativland and SST must pay $25,000 and half the wholesale proceeds from the copies of the record that were sold and not returned. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(Docket Report) District Court C D California: Failure to identify intervening rights during discovery sinks prosecution laches defense: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. [read post]