Search for: "MATTER OF RULES ON DISQUALIFICATION"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
Further, we have clarified that deliberate violation of rules will not be misconduct connected with the work without the rules' being reasonably designed to protect the employer's business relationship. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:48 am
Why does the new law matter? [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 7:20 am
In particular, please notify this Office if you currently represent clients or adjudicate matters in which this Office is involved and/or you have a family member who is representing clients or adjudicating matters in which this Office is involved so that we can evaluate any potential conflict of interest or disqualification issue that may need to be addressed under those circumstances. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:23 pm
There are many grounds on which the federal court can rule here. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:42 am
‘Pursuant to this universal rule, the status of the attorney/client relationship is assessed at the time the conflict arises, not at the time the motion to disqualify is presented to the court.'” [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:40 pm
As a general matter, the Texas courts have far more permissive rules concerning standing and justiciability. [read post]
23 May 2023, 5:01 am
Its interpretation empowered the Committee for Safeguarding National Security (CSNS) to decide such matters in the future. [read post]
21 May 2023, 1:24 pm
The Court applied Rule 2.11 and Rule 2.11(A) of the Code of Judicial Conduct for Delaware Judges. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:41 am
The implications of this ruling are significant for both insurers and the high-profile individuals involved. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:00 am
Summary of the law on disqualification of counsel There’s lots to say on the rules and case law relating to lawyer disqualification for conflicts of interest,[1] but for present purposes I can be fairly brief. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:41 am
” “I interpret the motion as seeking disqualification under Rule 2.11(A)(1). [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:57 pm
Defense counsel responded that he was not raising a Batson challenge, arguing instead that the court’s ruling “excludes a section of the potential jurors. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Accordingly, materially defective disclosure by the nominating stockholder could result in disqualification of its nominees. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:11 am
Texas federal Judge Ed Kinkeade rejected the disqualification request, calling the waiver language unambiguous. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:04 am
” “A final rule of law that crops up repeatedly in business divorce cases: ‘One who has served as attorney for a corporation may not represent an individual shareholder in a case in which his interests are adverse to other shareholders’ (Matter of Greenberg, 206 AD2d 963 [4th Dept 1994]). [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:20 am
It’s a sensible ruling. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
Deerin’s Virtual “Bright Line” Disqualification Rule A final rule of law that crops up repeatedly in business divorce cases: “One who has served as attorney for a corporation may not represent an individual shareholder in a case in which his interests are adverse to other shareholders” (Matter of Greenberg, 206 AD2d 963 [4th Dept 1994]). [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Resolving the issue of whether the plaintiff is entitled to retirement health benefits "requires examination of the relevant . . . plan documents" (Matter of Parrino v Albertson Water Dist., 118 AD3d 802, 802; see Matter of Consolidated Mut. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Resolving the issue of whether the plaintiff is entitled to retirement health benefits "requires examination of the relevant . . . plan documents" (Matter of Parrino v Albertson Water Dist., 118 AD3d 802, 802; see Matter of Consolidated Mut. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:57 am
The stay was hence vacated and the matter went back to the CJM, Surat where arguments resumed in February this year. [read post]
