Search for: "MERRELL v. U.S."
Results 141 - 160
of 382
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 7:04 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 7:27 pm
DePyper v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 11:31 am
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 593 (1993) (specifying the “the known or potential rate of error” as one of several factors in assessing the scientific reliability or validity of proffered expert witness’s opinion) Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:54 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and (3) the testimony assists the trier of fact through the application of scientific, technical, or other specialized expertise. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 593 (1993). [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:40 pm
Merrell Dow Pharms., 509 U.S. 579 (U.S. 1993). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:57 am
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993), detailed how courts deal with polygraph tests as scientific evidence, since neither the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 523 A.2d 374 (Pa. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm
DeLuca v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am
As the Court recognized in its 1986 Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 3:47 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and granted BNSF’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:16 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
”Jackson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Rule 702, Fed. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals regarding important expert testimony requires the appellate court to order a new trial, regardless of whether there was actually any substantive error in the expert testimony heard or not heard by the jury. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 6:24 am
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 593-94 (1993). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
