Search for: "MERRILL V. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 720
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 10:57 am
Hardt v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am
Merrill Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 592-93 (1993). [5] Id., citing and quoting United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Civil Rights Law section 65 was amended to provide that any person may elect to resume the use of a former middle name upon divorce or annulment and that the state shall not impose a fee to change the middle name on a state identifying document due to a change in marital status. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:58 pm
Merrill Lynch, 431 F. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 6:58 pm
My talk was in large part based on my book The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:17 am
Inslee, involving whether a state can require operators of state-subsidized home daycare centers to accept an exclusive bargaining agent to deal with the state on public-policy issues; Hall v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:07 am
Merrill, issued on September 24. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:46 am
”) Merrill v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 2:22 pm
New Image Global, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 6:33 am
Ass’n., 95 N.Y.2d 273, 281 (2000); see also Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 6:33 am
Ass’n., 95 N.Y.2d 273, 281 (2000); see also Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Merrill is the Charles Evans Hughes Professor at Columbia Law School. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
His calls for re-examining Times v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
This paper presents a survey of federal and state court decisions on these two questions, hoping to offer some guidance to practitioners. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 2:26 pm
See Evans v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
And an active one it is indeed, with the state supreme court asked to weigh in on a regular basis. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Plaintiffs in Daubert v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:05 am
Sanders v Grenadier Realty, Inc., 102 AD3d 460, 461 (1st Dept 2013) (precluding re-litigation of issues underlying state claim where identical issues underlying claim were decided by federal court that had refused to exercise jurisdiction over state claims); see also Hudson v Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 138 AD3d 511, 515 (1st Dept 2016), lv to appeal denied, 28 NY3d 902 (2016) (party estopped from relitigating “discrete… [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]