Search for: "Majors v. Owens" Results 141 - 160 of 309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2023, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
Owen v Hurlbut Owen is a relatively rare example of the powerful convergence of two common-law doctrines in the same business divorce case: misappropriation of corporate opportunity and faithless servant. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:30 am by Dan Ernst
This effect was stronger for children residing in non-agricultural areas.This is in line with what I learned from a little research, conducted for my 2007 exam in American Legal History, on the administration of the Keating-Owen Act between its passage in 1916 and its demise in Hammer v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Owen, Jennifer Walker Elrod, and Catharina Haynes, and now joined by recent Trump appointees Don R. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
On 17 January 2020 the Press Gazette reported on Guardian columnist Owen Jones, who has been the subject of an “unrelenting” campaign of abuse by far-right sympathisers. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  So what follows is our best interpretation of the position of the fifty states (plus DC and Puerto Rico) on whether any presumption arises when a plaintiff claims an inadequate warning (almost every case) that a hypothetical warning (never in fact given) would have been heeded.One thing we have discovered of particular note (at least to us), is that the heeding presumption is an area where the federal courts have run amok, ignoring their obligations under the Erie Doctrine to leave… [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  Full disclosure – Bexis filed a brief for PLAC in Phillips on the Restatement Third issue.While three justices aren’t a majority of Pennsylvania’s seven-member Supreme Court, in Phillips they outnumbered the court’s Azzarello supporters 3-2 (there was a vacancy and an obscure concurrence in the result). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
 A majority of courts have concluded that a student or trainee has the right to have a jury consider his or her education, training, and proposed occupation or career in calculating damages for impaired earning capacity. [read post]