Search for: "Marks v. Cross" Results 141 - 160 of 2,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 9:06 pm by Christopher J. Walker
As the Supreme Court suggested two years ago in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am by John Elwood
It argues that the Federal Circuit erred in holding that the refusal to register a mark under Section 2(c) violates the First Amendment when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure. [read post]
  The panelists also indicated that FINRA is using CAT data to surveil cross-market and cross-product (i.e., options impacted by swap trading), fractional share order marking (i.e., held v. not held), and firms’ pricing of fractional share fills based on a review of representative orders. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Both the parties were cross-examined and the Judge carefully considered the police incident log. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The motion is marked as submitted and a decision is imminent. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm by Michael Lowe
  Marks can still get arrested: that is where an experienced criminal defense is particularly important. [read post]
Such considerations as available remedies and penalties, license-termination conditions, cross-licensing, and jurisdiction are often just as important as price. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by News Desk
As part of its enforcement activities, the Food and Drug Administration sends warning letters to entities under its jurisdiction. [read post]