Search for: "Marks v. USA"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2022, 7:08 am
Ein völkerrechtlicher Vertrag wäre nicht erforderlich. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The FDA acknowledges, for instance, that the acceptable intake is set to mark “a small theoretical increase in risk,” and a “highly hypothetical concept that should not be regarded as a realistic indication of the actual risk,” and thus not an actual risk.[9] The corresponding hypothetical or theoretical risk to the acceptable intake level is clearly small when compared with the human’s lifetime probability of developing cancer (which the FDA states is greater… [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 4:13 am
"] Sun Bum LLC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:52 am
Enigma Software Group USA, LLC, 592 U. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 10:11 am
Supreme Court has posted online the transcript and audio of yesterday’s oral argument in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 1:52 am
So, during the promulgation discussion, it was decided to, again, remove the trade marks from the draft. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:23 am
Ltd. and Gree USA Inc.). [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 10:00 am
., v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am
The court, affirming in a nonprecedential decision the cancellation of the registration for the BF-7 mark, found that substantial evidence supported the Board’s finding that another Korean company, and not the trademark holder, actually used the mark in commerce (Sunbio Corp. v.Biogrand Co., Ltd., December 14, 2021, Stoll, K.). [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
She was poised even when she was being peppered with questions from all sides of the bench, as she was in defending an ultimately unsuccessful position in her first argument, in Begay v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:54 am
See, e.g., Stuart Spector Designs, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 11:30 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 1:30 pm
Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 6:00 pm
Bus. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Quoted in 'Not Surprised': Justice Alito defends controversial speech as he marks 15 years on Supreme Court, USA Today (Jan. 31, 2021) (Also available here). [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 8:08 am
Brittex, not Dollar, was the first to use that mark in connection with pawn brokerage and pawn shop services, said the court, and the Board provided no support for the notion that a registrant has priority as to a specific service it was second to offer just because it was first to offer a different specific service (Brittex Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 8:25 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
