Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia"
Results 141 - 160
of 296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Soon after he authored the lead opinion in Roe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am
District of Columbia, the Court’s 2008 Second Amendment “right to bear arms” decision, noted that short-barreled shotguns are “not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:34 pm
And yet, despite a pedigree that also includes Columbia, Harvard Law, a Marshall Scholarship, a Sentelle clerkship, a partnership at super-elite Kellogg Huber, and a high-ranking Justice Department position, Judge Gorsuch today descended from on high to dirty his hands with a discovery dispute.Check out his opinion in Lee v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm
“Twenty-three states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, all would have their statutes declared unconstitutional at once. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Roberts Court: District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Roberts Court: District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:41 am
Attorney for the District of Columbia. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 7:04 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1980. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:16 am
Indeed, every state establishing same-sex marriage through legislation has recognized this (Vermont, Connecticut, New Hampshire, New York, and the District of Columbia). [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:59 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Chief Justice Marshall considered the matter directly in Loughborough v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Chief Justice Marshall considered the matter directly in Loughborough v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am
In that action, three hospitals affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Health Plan, an HMO, have appealed a ruling by the federal district court for the District of Columbia holding that, although the hospitals did not directly contract with the federal government, they were still subject to OFCCP jurisdiction as federal subcontractors (UPMC Braddock v Harris, March 30, 2013, (96 EPD ¶44,801)). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm
Young v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:17 am
However, the Court noted three situations (based on historical understanding) in which Congress could give judicial power to non-Article III courts: Courts for non-state areas (U.S. territories and the District of Columbia) in which Congress is acting as both local and national government. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:57 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking to compel removal of the administrative action to that forum. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 4:43 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. [read post]
