Search for: "Marshall v. Peter"
Results 141 - 160
of 252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
Major interests Because the stakes in these cases are quite large, the parties marshal support from some of the top Supreme Court advocates. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
(Reexamination Alert) Recapture doctrine before the CAFC: In re Mostafazedeh (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D New York: Patentee’s ‘sufficiently plausible’ belief as to the scope of patents negates intent to deceive necessary for false marking claim: Max Impact v Sherwood Group (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas – Marshall jury verdict for plaintiff; invalidity rejected even under ‘preponderance’… [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:06 am
Cataldo, Peter W.: Appointed to TTAB in 2006. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
Before the discussion, Clare Cushman will introduce viewers to the Society’s newest publication, An Illustrated Guide to the Supreme Court.The Organization of American Historians is circulating the amicus brief it joined in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:48 pm
Kansas and Peter v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
’ ( Brodie v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Black, A Constitutional Faith (1968) Certain other works dealt with obscure matters or issues of foreign law, such as the following: John Marshall Harlan, Manning the Dikes; Some Comments on the Statutory Certiorari Jurisdiction and Jurisdictional Statement Practice of the Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Ruth Bader Ginsburg, A Selective Survey of English Language Studies on Scandinavian Law (1970) Stephen G. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 10:23 am
No power delegated is "plenary" within its "sphere", despite the opinion of Justice Marshall in Gibbons v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
Crump, 376 N.C. at 392, quoting Peter A. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
On 21 June 2017 Warby J heard an application in the case of RJH v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm
” Eccentric commentator Peter Hitchens weighed in with a piece in the Mail on Sunday with the title ““What will women gain from all this squawking about sex pests? [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Chapter Readings· Marbury v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 1:40 pm
Peter “Bo” Rutledge is Associate Professor at the University of Georgia Law School has made the astute observation that “Justice must have intellectual integrity. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
Parmet, Charity Scott, Marshall B. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am
Cariou v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
On 23 March 2017 Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of EZE Group Ltd v Taylor Marshall Ltd. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
Peter Plotkin started a vending machine business in 1997 called Superior Vending Corp. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
