Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2011, 7:42 am
CERT. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:38 pm
When Congress statutorily classifies identified matters as legally cognizable injuries it is merely codifying principles of harm. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:14 am
Martinez, in which the Court just granted cert. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
The first observation about the question is that it conflates several issues. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 10:21 am
Moreover, the sheer volume of cert-stage cases makes it much harder for the Court’s independent research to make up for the party’s deficiencies, though of course the very smart law clerks in the cert. pool will do their best. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 8:58 am
In its cert petition, the government presents three questions for the court to consider. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm
I find overly cynical Rick Hills’s legal-realism approach to the questions presented here. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 5:08 pm
The questions presented for review are as follows: I. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:23 pm
” The district court decided as a matter of law that the asserted claims were drawn to non-statutory subject matter and as such, unpatentable. [read post]
31 May 2007, 9:06 am
Some also questioned why the revised rules require amici to file within 30 days even if respondent seeks an extension. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 11:32 am
As we stated in Apple III, '[t]he question becomes one of degree, to be evaluated by the district court.' [...] [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:35 pm
” The relisting of Hedican could simply be a routine matter of deciding what to do with a case in light of Cameron. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:54 am
Patent eligibility is a question of law. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:50 am
Whether or not to grant cert here is ultimately a question [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 5:25 pm
By Sarah Burstein, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Oklahoma College of Law Samsung Elecs. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:52 am
Shkreli's second question concerns the calculation of forfeitable profits. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:47 am
Finally, as an empirical matter, reverse payments are not needed. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:07 pm
Supreme Court’s second grant of cert in Fisher v University of Texas at Austin (Dkt No 14-981) were posted prior to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:35 pm
Maybe Samsung felt that a formal cert question about Federal Circuit interna wouldn [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:36 pm
But the matter continues in the lower courts. [read post]
