Search for: "Matter of Lilly"
Results 141 - 160
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2011, 8:42 am
For a more detailed look at the issues behind this matter, read "Big Pharma and Section 337: The Next Frontier for Enforcement of Non-Orange Book Listed Pharmaceutical Drug Patents," published in BNA's Pharmaceutical Law and Industry Report. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:00 pm
Networking Networking can be a challenge no matter where you are in your career. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., ___ F. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:39 pm
In a first attempt at amendment of the claims during prosecution, Lilly offered limitation of the antifolate to "pemetrexed" and of the methylmalonic acid lowering agent to vitamin B12, but the examiner objected that the amendments introduced subject matter beyond that originally filed, contrary to article 123(2) EPC. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
In the matter of Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Limited (in administration) and In the matter of the Insolvency Act 1986, heard 13 and 14 July 2011. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
Eli Lilly & Co., Fed. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:39 am
: A Comprehensive Assessment of the Impact of Eli Lilly and its Progeny in the Courts and PTO , 17 ALB. [read post]
Disclosure of compounds without link to claimed method fails to meet written description requirement
14 Apr 2009, 8:24 am
Eli Lilly & Co. after the jump. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:54 am
Lilly claimed that this separate written description requirement applies to all claims—both original and amended—to ensure that inventors have actually invented the subject matter claimed. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 3:03 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
Lord Sumption noted that the DoE is part of our law - it doesn't matter whether it is fair or not! [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:49 am
Since the landmark UK Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48), judges of the lower courts have voiced the need for clarification from the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 8:18 am
Eli-Lilly. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:57 pm
Eli Lilly, Prometheus v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 10:04 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1347 (Fed. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:17 pm
Searle: Ariad brought suit against Lilly on June 25, 2002, the day the ’516 patent issued. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 11:00 pm
.▫️For its premier year, the event’s organizers decided that all the selected films must have been made in Appalachia, by Appalachian filmmakers/crew, or have subject matter related to the Appalachian region.▫️Among the projects selected to screen, you’ll find MANUFACTURED LUCK, a short film written and directed by Kevin Keck, an East Tennessee-based creative, who set out to “blend traditional Appalachian storytelling with film. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:21 am
Eli Lilly and Company, SCT Docket No. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:14 am
UK Supreme Court moves towards a UK Doctrine of Equivalents in Lilly pemetrexed battle. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 8:03 am
The Court of Appeal heard arguments regarding whether, if they had accepted Kymab's construction of "in situ replacement", they could nevertheless have found infringement on the basis of Actavis v Eli Lilly (Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48, IPKat post). [read post]
