Search for: "Matter of Nowak" Results 141 - 154 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2024, 6:45 am by Eric Goldman
 For two reasons, we don’t think that matters. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Stephanie Rossello
The notion of indirect personal data is new and cannot be found in the text of the GDPR, nor in earlier CJEU case-law on the matter. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Vito Todeschini
Similar conclusions have been reached by leading commentators (Nowak and MacArthur, p. 317), an ad hoc expert group set up by the African Union and the European Union (para. 14), and the U.N. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:44 am by Dianne Saxe
There are no tax subsidies for renewables in Ontario, or Canada for that matter. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am by Beck, et al.
 Second, although we’re defense lawyers, we’re not representing Medtronic on this or on any product liability matter at the moment. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am by Schachtman
The November 2018 issue of the American Bar Association Journal (ABAJ) featured an exposé-style article on the hazards of our chemical environment, worthy of Mother Jones, or the International Journal of Health Nostrums, by a lawyer, Alan Bell.1Alan Bell, according to his website, is a self-described “environmental health warrior. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:56 am
 NOTES:1 Julia Kozma, Manfred Nowak and Martin Scheinin, A World Court of Human Rights - Consolidated Statute and Commentary (Vienna: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 2010). [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Any other rule “would effectively empower a majority to silence dissidents simply as a matter of personal predilections,” Cohen v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
Cruise Ship Litigation and the application of the law is an ever-changing landscape. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:35 am by MBettman
”) In re Nowak, 2004-Ohio-6777 (“[t]he proposition that the one-subject rule is both directory and potentially capable of being applied by the court to invalidate a law is essentially an oxymoron. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:58 pm by Rick
You say you want an explanation Well, you know… We all want to understand. [read post]