Search for: "Matter of Rr."
Results 141 - 160
of 176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2010, 8:01 am
Accordingly, a divided Appellate Court found temporary benefits after the termination were properly denied.You can contrast this decision with other recent Illinois Commission decisions in Wleklinski v Kelly Services (08 IWCC 254, March 2008) where a temporary worker at RR Donnelly suffered a wrist sprain accident on 11/14/06 with immediate notice and immediate medical care. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Illinois Terminal RR, 400 NE 2d 715 – Ill: Appellate Court, 5th Dist. 1980 Bringing any deficiencies in a court file to the trial court’s attention is not “jumping the gun” but merely adequate preparation for any possible appeal. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Donnelley & Sons Co. with Cybersecurity-Related Controls Violations (June 18, 2024), available at https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2024-75. [2] In the Matter of R.R. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
Georgia RR Bank & Trust , 253 Ga. 596, 600 (322 SE2d 870) (1980)), was to list successive contingent beneficiaries: if the City did not take the bequest, it was to be offered to the historical society; if the historical society was no longer in existence, the bequest was to be offered to the society’s successor; if the historical society or its successor declined the bequest or did not exist, the bequest was to go to "a comparable charitable entity. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am
As the U.K. government prepares itself for the beginning of Brexit negotiations in March 2017, it is becoming increasingly clear that there is no off-ramp—and, for that matter, no brakes on the car. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
Consider an article by two would-be expert witnesses, who testify for plaintiffs, and confidently misstate the meaning of a confidence interval: “Thus, a RR [relative risk] of 1.8 with a confidence interval of 1.3 to 2.9 could very likely represent a true RR of greater than 2.0, and as high as 2.9 in 95 out of 100 repeated trials. [read post]
Beecher-Monas Proposes to Abandon Common Sense, Science, and Expert Witnesses for Specific Causation
11 Sep 2015, 3:23 pm
Law reviews are not peer reviewed, not that peer review is a strong guarantor of credibility, accuracy, and truth. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am
Some expert witnesses adopted opinions as a matter of convenience and malleability, but most witnesses expressed sincerely held opinions. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm
The meaning and operation of s 98 is less than straightforward to understand for practitioners (let alone for the parties themselves) and, oddly, most consideration of it has been by family judges whose view is that, ultimately, s 98 is a matter for their criminal brethren whilst at the same time criminal authorities on the point are notable [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm
”[11] And they wind up telling us vacuously that if the relevant epidemiology showed a small effect size, such as a two percent increased risk (RR = 1.02), then it would be unclear “how any animal data could cause one to substantially alter the best estimate of a human effect to reach a more-likely-than-not threshold. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
The law as applied, however, was another matter, with most New Jersey judges keen to find ways to escape the logical and scientific implications of the articulated standards, at least in civil cases.1 For example, in Grassis v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:05 am
Overall, the VCLT can serve as a practical starting point for examining several of the questions of interest in this article (see, for example, Kolb or the contributions in Corten & Klein (eds), Dörr & Schmalenbach (eds), or Cannizzaro (ed)). [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 2:52 pm
Overall, the VCLT can serve as a practical starting point for examining several of the questions of interest in this article (see, for example, Kolb or the contributions in Corten & Klein (eds), Dörr & Schmalenbach (eds), or Cannizzaro (ed)). [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Kan. 2002) (acknowledging that most courts require a showing of RR > 2, but questioning their reasoning), aff’d, 356 F. 3d 1326 (10th Cir. 2004) Smith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
In fact, Rule 26(b)(1) describes the scope of allowable discovery as follows: ‛Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action… . [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Sander Greenland and others have raised various theoretical objections to the argument that relative risks should exceed two before attribution can be made in specific cases. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm
The authors of the hepatitis A blog conduct surveillance on matters related to hepatitis A's impact on individuals and families in different cities, states, and regions. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
In re Paoli RR Yard PCB Litig., 35 F.3d 717, 745 (3d Cir. 1994). [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:00 am
Does she talk as if she has experience with this type of matter? [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:00 am
Does she talk as if she has experience with this type of matter? [read post]
