Search for: "Matter of S. G. v B. G." Results 141 - 160 of 2,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2019, 3:45 am by Jessica Kroeze
The appellant's arguments, insofar as relevant to the present decision, can be summarised as follows:Main request - Novelty vis-à-vis D1The subject-matter of claim 1 was novel over the disclosure in D1. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
[from the IPBiz post Harvard Business Review article: Plagiarize with Pride in August 2006; see alsohttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/12/plagiarism-kind-of-defense.html]In the memo's section on 12(b)(6), there is a point on federal jurisdiction:See Immunocept, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:12 pm by Michelle Ball, Attorney for Students
 Then Student B (plus Student B's friends) start up again, and Student B corners Student V in the bathroom, telling Student V he should not have gotten Student B in trouble. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:51 am by Jon Robinson
  Second, Roberts argues that, because this Court has refused to read the statutory phrase “person entitled to compensation” in §933(g) to mean “person awarded compensation,” Estate of Cowart v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the Town terminating the plaintiff [Employee] based on the findings and recommendation of a disciplinary hearing officer, Supreme Court [a] denied the Town's motion to dismiss the Employee petition; [b] granted Employee's petition to the extent of annulling the penalty imposed; and [c] remitting the matter to the Town for the imposition of a less severe penalty. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the Town terminating the plaintiff [Employee] based on the findings and recommendation of a disciplinary hearing officer, Supreme Court [a] denied the Town's motion to dismiss the Employee petition; [b] granted Employee's petition to the extent of annulling the penalty imposed; and [c] remitting the matter to the Town for the imposition of a less severe penalty. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 8:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In 2006, the Supreme Court of Canada held in S (DB) v G (SR) stated, 60 No child support analysis should ever lose sight of the fact that support is the right of the child… While this is trite law, the concept still comes up in unique circumstances such as with a disabled adult child who may have an entitlement to support under the Divorce Act, but would not under Ontario’s Family Law Act. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In Dunn v Harris 2022 NY Slip Op 50641(U), the mother wished to relocate from New York to Denver, Colorado for a new job. [read post]