Search for: "Matter of Seaman"
Results 141 - 160
of 348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
IN ADMIRALTY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MAINTENANCE AND CURE This matter came on for an evidentiary hearing, before the Court, sitting without a jury, on May 14, 2015. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
The Jones Act is a complex legal matter and you need only the best help you can find. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm
Seaman Calls Jones Act Attorney after Severe Leg Injury G. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:26 pm
O’Neill, Esq. of Eckert Seamans. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:54 am
Accordingly, the Circuit Court remanded the matter to the district court to “proceed to trial on the amount of maintenance and cure due” the seaman. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:45 pm
The Court stated that it did not matter whether Renco based its argument on a fiduciary or contractual relationship—it was not blamelessly ignorant and cannot invoke equitable tolling. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:28 am
As a general legal matter, Jones Act claims cannot be removed to federal court. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:02 am
First, the court found that this case arises out of the ‘same matter’ as the Target case. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 2:27 pm
., 318 U.S. 660, 669 (1943), ruled that a shipowner could be liable to a Jones Act seaman for harm suffered as the result of any negligence on the part of the ship’s doctor while treating the seaman. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:12 am
Absent a valid arbitration clause under the Convention, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action. 9 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:00 am
No Matter What, You Need Jones Act Lawyers If you have been hurt in a similar accident, you need Jones Act lawyers. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:11 am
Apex Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19, 111 S.Ct. 317, 112 L.Ed. 275 (1990); In the Matter of Waterman SS Corp., 780 F.Supp. 1093 (E.D. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:14 am
The Supreme Court has affirmed the historic principle that a seaman may recover damages if vessel negligence contributed in any degree, no matter how slight, to cause his injury. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
“All that matters (according to the Second Circuit) is when the illness occurs, not when it started to present symptoms. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:16 am
Compensation under the Jones Act can be a complicated matter and may be very dependent on the facts of the case. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
The owners of the vessel, T and T Marine, are also cooperating with the local authorities in the matter. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:51 pm
On December 6, 2013, Employer filed a Motion for Summary Judgment that Claimant was not a Jones Act seaman. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:21 am
And whether the law of the state shall be declared by its Legislature in a statute or by its highest court in a decision is not a matter of federal concern. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Seaman Calls Jones Act Attorneys after Captain Disregards Request T. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:12 pm
This summary was prepared by Tara Lattomus of Eckert Seamans. [read post]
