Search for: "Matter of State of N.Y. v John T." Results 141 - 160 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Cir. 2008): Limits patentable subject matter. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm by Schachtman
In 1944, New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, held, in a silicosis personal injury case, that: “[i]t is a matter of common knowledge that it is injurious to the lungs and dangerous to health to work in silica dust, a fact which defendant was bound to know. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 2:58 pm by Josh Blackman
Tilden 482 (John Bigelow, ed., N.Y., Harper Brothers 1885) (emphasis added); see also id. ch. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
Olah, “My Search for Carbocations and Their Role in Chemistry,” Nobel Lecture (Dec. 8, 1994), quoting George von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (N.Y. 1960); see also McMillan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
” Chief Justice John Roberts notably relied on a similar approach in 2015, in King v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
As a preliminary matter, I can’t help but reflect for a moment on how we got to where we are: Most people, I think, do not have a quarrel with the bottom-line conclusions and results. [read post]