Search for: "Matter of Stephen C."
Results 141 - 160
of 1,368
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2021, 1:01 pm
” A lower court tossed out Taylor’s conviction under Section 924(c). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
The Democratic appointees—Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan—will surely vote to retain the status quo. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 3:00 am
The grand jury subpoena sought communications and other records related to fundraising and accounting by groups including Defending the Republic, a group claiming 501(c) 4 nonprofit status and a PAC by the same name. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:11 am
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant in Waynesboro, Georgia, and the Virgil C. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:54 pm
Misdemeanors, felonies and traffic matters are initiated in the district court. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm
Célia Belin, Brookings visiting fellow, will offer opening remarks and moderate the discussion. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 am
The Court succinctly summarised the matter as "generally, on a fair reading of ss. 15(1)(b) and 15(1)(c), a patent can be granted to a legal person for an invention with an artificial intelligence system or device as the inventor".Ultimately what the case focused on is whether a valid patent application has been made, rather than who will own any patent that might be granted in the future. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 am
The Court succinctly summarised the matter as "generally, on a fair reading of ss. 15(1)(b) and 15(1)(c), a patent can be granted to a legal person for an invention with an artificial intelligence system or device as the inventor".Ultimately what the case focused on is whether a valid patent application has been made, rather than who will own any patent that might be granted in the future. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 am
The Court succinctly summarised the matter as "generally, on a fair reading of ss. 15(1)(b) and 15(1)(c), a patent can be granted to a legal person for an invention with an artificial intelligence system or device as the inventor".Ultimately what the case focused on is whether a valid patent application has been made, rather than who will own any patent that might be granted in the future. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 am
The Court succinctly summarised the matter as "generally, on a fair reading of ss. 15(1)(b) and 15(1)(c), a patent can be granted to a legal person for an invention with an artificial intelligence system or device as the inventor".Ultimately what the case focused on is whether a valid patent application has been made, rather than who will own any patent that might be granted in the future. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
” On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Mark Fenster, the Stephen C. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
”On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Mark Fenster, the Stephen C. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am
Key Findings A typical American household with four cell phones on a “family share” plan, paying $100 per month for taxable wireless service, would pay nearly $300 per year in taxes, fees, and government surcharges—up from $270 in 2020. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:27 am
The language of §594.39(c)(1) comes virtually verbatim from a Colorado statute upheld by the Supreme Court in Hill v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm
Birss LJ indicated that two further matters supported his interpretation. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 12:56 pm
Stephen F. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 6:10 am
Posted by Stephen Klemash, Gaurav Malhotra, and Lance Mortlock, EY, on Sunday, September 26, 2021 Editor's Note: Stephen Klemash is EY Americas Center for Board Matters Leader, Gaurav Malhotra is EY Americas Reshaping Results & US Restructuring Leader, and Lance Mortlock is EY Canada Managing Partner for Energy. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 4:13 pm
On this evidence, it looks as though IPSO’s standards department made some phone calls or sent some emails and then, when complications emerged, simply let the matter drop. [read post]
