Search for: "Matter of Sutton v Sutton" Results 141 - 160 of 308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2015, 5:06 pm by Giles Peaker
The matter went to trial where the landlord disputed notice, but lost on that point. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am by William Eskridge
   Starting with his landmark opinion for the Court in Romer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm by Austin Nimocks
Another good reason to review Judge Sutton’s opinion is how he aptly addresses both Loving v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
The first is that just a month after the Supreme Court had seemingly dodged the issue for the rest of its 2014 Term, Judge Jeffrey Sutton’s decision in DeBoer v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
The relatively painless resolution Sutton seemed to favor at oral argument on August 6, ruling that the one-sentence rejection of a same-sex marriage case in 1972′s Baker v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm by Dale Carpenter
Under this approach, the Sixth Circuit would consider itself bound by the one-sentence order in 1972’s Baker v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:43 am by Joy Waltemath
Affirming the fee award, a Sixth Circuit panel explained that accepting the lower offer was one measure of success (or lack thereof), that Rule 68 did not conflict with the fee-shifting statute at issue, and that the reduction was reasonable (McKelvey v Secretary of United States Army, September 18, 2014, Sutton, J). [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:36 am by Marty Lederman
 Even so, the two judges in the majority appear to be of the view that that doesn't matter, since the assailants might have had nonreligious reasons--"motives"--to assault their victims. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
First, I think Judge Sutton is most apt to accept the view that the Supreme Court’s 1972 summary refusal to hear an appeal in Baker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:01 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court’s holdings in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v Williams, the Iowa Supreme Court majority explained that it did not agree with the employee’s contention that the 2008 amendments required it to interpret the state law to include the disorder. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am by Jag
They referred to the recent decision of Mohamed and CF v SSHD (2014) a case which sought to quash the claimants’ control orders and TPIMs. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am by Jag
They referred to the recent decision of Mohamed and CF v SSHD (2014) a case which sought to quash the claimants’ control orders and TPIMs. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:38 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge White filed a separate dissenting opinion (Sexton v Panel Processing, Inc, May 9, 2014, Sutton, J). [read post]