Search for: "Municipal Services Corp. v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Newspaper articles concerning a state or municipal officer or employee resigning from his position[4] frequently report that the appointing authority "accepted" the individual's resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Newspaper articles concerning a state or municipal officer or employee resigning from his position[4] frequently report that the appointing authority "accepted" the individual's resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Newspaper articles concerning a state or municipal officer or employee resigning from his position[4] frequently report that the appointing authority "accepted" the individual's resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Newspaper articles concerning a state or municipal officer or employee resigning from his position[4] frequently report that the appointing authority "accepted" the individual's resignation. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113 - ADASee issue description at Public Citizeno SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:41 am by PaulKostro
Siemens Corp., No. 06-4935, 2008 WL 906244, at *15 (D.N.J. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
" U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, March 04, 2008 Executive Air Taxi Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Supreme Court’s test for content-based restrictions on commercial speech set forth in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
There is no dispute that Lindquist personally bought the phone, pays for its monthly service, and sometimes uses it in the course of his job.Nissen v. [read post]