Search for: "NORRIS V. STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 391
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States A libel claim brought by a Philadelphia firefighter against the New York Daily News has been dismissed. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
Maybe our motto here at DDLaw should be “we read law review articles so you don’t have to. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 7:19 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Norris, 16 U.S.C.M.A. 574, 37 C.M.R. 194 (to be admissible, must be verbatim); United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
Appellate History The Prince appealed the five orders of Vos J, Norris J and Mann J (together the “Orders”) to the Court of Appeal, which unanimously refused the appeal (as to all of the Orders) on 31 July 2014 (HRH Prince Abdulaziz Bin Mishal Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud v Apex Global Management Ltd & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 1106). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
It stated that Vos J’s decision to make the order was well within the margin accorded to the case management decision and the decisions taken by Norris J to issue to the “Unless order” and Mann J to refuse relief from sanctions were also correct in principle after their careful consideration of the competing arguments. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:12 am
The case is Microtech Contracting Corporation v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:12 am
The case is Microtech Contracting Corporation v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 7:06 am
The case is Microtech Contracting Corporation v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am by Katharine Alexander, Olswang LLP
The orders resulting from these applications were: an unless order for non-compliance with the personal signature order, stating that unless complied with, the Prince’s defence would be struck out (Norris J on 9 September 2013). [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm by H. Scott Leviant
A class was certified.After the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]