Search for: "Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2011, 4:32 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008) had effectively overruled Elvis. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm by Carley Roberts and Mike Le
WisconsinIn Tetra Tech EC Inc. and Lower Fox River Remediation LLC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:35 am by Anne B. Sekel
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 467 U.S. 837 (1984), the landmark case that set forth the test for determining the authority of federal agency regulations. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Charges filed by UNITE HERE; complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al., 467 U.S. 837 (1984) and Chevron deference did not play a large role in the Court’s decision, which was concerned to some extent with IRS regulations. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
<> FRACKING'S MOST WANTED: Report Identifies Top 10 Oil & Gas Companies for Spills & Legal Violations - (April 2, 2015) – Only three out the 36 states with active oil and gas operations make information about companies' spills and legal violations easily available to the public, according to a report by the Natural Resources Defense Council and FracTracker… [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott &amp; Kindermann
Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority); application of CEQA to council enactment of measures which qualify as initiatives on local ballots (Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. [read post]
Brief for Natural Resources Defense Council as amici curiae supporting respondent, Monsanto v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:16 am by Jennifer Chacon
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. that courts should defer to an agency’s legitimate interpretation of an ambiguous statute. [read post]