Search for: "Natural Resources Defense Council v. Administrator" Results 141 - 160 of 575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984) held that courts should defer to an agency’s construction of a statute that it administers. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 2:02 pm by editor@howarddc.com
Chlorpyrifos has been registered for use in the U.S. for over 50 years, but has become increasingly controversial in the dozen years since the Pesticide Action Network of North America and the Natural Resources Defense Council filed a petition in 2007 to cancel all registrations and revoke all tolerances for chlorpyrifos. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm by Ann R. Klee
Natural Resources Defense Council deference. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm by Paul R. Verkuil
Natural Resources Defense Council—but Sunstein and Vermeule’s take on the revival of the nondelegation doctrine is worth emphasizing. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:26 pm by Kevin Johnson
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-844 (1984) . . . . [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:46 am by Maryellen Fullerton
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and about whether the government had changed its position since the Supreme Court decided to take up the case. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 3:29 pm by Leland E. Beck
Natural Resources Defense Council: A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 2:01 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council, it looks like the usual suspects will once again have that question hashed out for them. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
Court of Appeals of the Ninth Circuit, in a per curiam opinion, affirmed in part a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration's revised travel ban issued by a federal district court in Hawaii v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:03 pm by Series of Essays
Closing a Concocted Clean Water Act Loophole July 20, 2020 | Jon Devine, Natural Resources Defense Counsel, and David Henkin, Earthjustice The Court’s refusal to eviscerate a key safeguard in the Clean Water Act reflects a welcome, and precisely correct, focus on applying the plain text of the law consistent with the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al., 467 U.S. 837 (1984) and Chevron deference did not play a large role in the Court’s decision, which was concerned to some extent with IRS regulations. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:54 am by Walter James
EPA, No. 20-cv-03714 (S.D.N.Y May 13, 2020), and Natural Resources Defense Council v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:04 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., the Court explained: [T]he presence of some uncertainty does not expand Chevron deference to cover virtually any interpretation of the National Bank Act. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
See Appellate Court Draws Line In Sand Requiring CEQA Review Before City Council Enactment of Land Use Measure. [read post]