Search for: "Nichols v. Backes" Results 141 - 160 of 196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2011, 8:01 am by David Smith
First, strictly temporally, is David Smith's version, followed by Dave's]Whittaker v Kinnear [2011] EWHC 1479 (QB)This case raises some interesting questions about estoppel and sale.K sold her property and it’s grounds to W and his business associate, Mr Nichols in 2007, apparently because she could no longer afford it. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Eastman got an á la mode summary judgment over best mode, because the disclosure held back critical data as a trade secret. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  But again, it might just be our admittedly pro-defense perspective.Anyway, back to Toner. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am by INFORRM
While the Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh had regarded it as an open question whether Reynolds applies to opinion, Lords Nicholls and Hobhouse had said in Reynolds ([2001] 2 AC 127, at 201 and 193-5 per Lord Nicholls and 237-8 per Lord Hobhouse.) that the expression of opinion was protected, if at all by, by fair comment. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
  On 25 January 2011 the Committee heard evidence from Lords Lester and Nicholls and Professor Anthony Bradley. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am by INFORRM
  In the absence of regulation – through courts – false ideas backed by the powerful gain the ascendancy. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by GuestPost
We are delighted to welcome Andrew Hayward of Durham Law School back to Human Rights in Ireland to discuss the landmark decision in Radmacher v Granatino. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
If we don’t make it seems like we’re all likely to move back in with our parents. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am by Matthew Hill
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am by INFORRM
Moreover, these innovations in Commonwealth law form part of a process of development that we can trace back to the US Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times v Sullivan 376 U.S. 254 (1964). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by INFORRM
It lists, as Lord Nicholls did in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd (1999), factors to be taken into account by the court when deciding whether a defendant has acted responsibly, but as several cases in the lower courts have shown, judges may be encouraged to view these as tripwires for defendants. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 6:04 am by Jody Madeira
I will be back very soon to blog about the time that the McVeigh jury visited family members and survivors in Oklahoma City after the trials of McVeigh and Nichols had ended. [read post]