Search for: "P H I, INCORPORATED" Results 141 - 160 of 312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
I am happy to announce the publication of an article, "The Emerging Normative Structures of Transnational Law: Non-State Enterprises in Polycentric Asymmetric Global Orders," that appears in the B.Y.U. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:50 am
Applicant's counsel discussed the amendment of the drawing from SHARPIN to SharpIN with Examining Attorney Michael P. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 (a) The recitals set forth in the whereas clauses are incorporated herein. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 (a) The recitals set forth in the whereas clauses are incorporated herein. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 6:25 pm by Jon
They did not "write the Privileges or Immunities Clause out of the Amendment" as some commentators have claimed, but it did establish a precedent that has been followed ever since.Soon thereafter the Court decided not to incorporate the federal requirement for grand jury indictment in Hurtado v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 9:11 pm by ALBERTO HUAPAYA OLIVARES
”(s/p)De igual manera Klein Vieira L. (2010) señala que “El traslado de condenados a su país de origen es un nuevo instituto que viene suscitando muchas dudas y problemas, una vez que está poco explotado en el ámbito doctrinario”(p. 92)Sin embargo, en cuanto al devenir histórico, Klein  Viera L. (2010) citando a la profesora   brasileña Castilho, E (2008) señala que fue empleada por primera vez en el… [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
Moreover, because Section 636(a) expressly incorporates any authorities granted to magistrate judges by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, . . . the Court's analyses of whether the NIT Warrant was statutorily permissible and whether it was allowed under Rule 41(b) are necessarily intertwined.U.S. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 11:41 am by Daniel Cappetta
” The Court also noted that “[i]n defining the requisites of a defendant-capped plea, neither the statute nor the rule incorporates a time limit. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 8:37 am by Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D.
” Questions E, F, G, H, I and J are now five-year disclosure questions requiring responses for only the five years immediately preceding the date of the application. [read post]