Search for: "P. v. Gray" Results 141 - 160 of 378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2012, 10:50 pm
" Full story: The Telegraph.Family Justice Review draft legislationThe Law Society's response to the Family Justice Review draft legislation.Home Secretary and CPS appeal ancillary relief order to disclose material obtained under mutual legal assistance provisionsPermission has been granted to the Home secretary and the Crown Prosecution Service to appeal Moylan J's decision in P v P [2012] EWHC 1733 (Fam) [see report below]. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
(IP Factor) Netherlands: Court of Appeal, The Hague: Costs of procedure : Lundbeck v Tiefenbacher, Centrafarm Services and Ratiopharm (EPLAW) Poland: First judgment on differences between sponsorship and advertising of pharmaceutical product (Class 46) US: USPTO to begin recalculating patent term following Wyeth v Kappos (Patently-O) (Patent Docs) US: CAFC confirms PTO is miscalculating (undercalculating) delays in prosecution and the corresponding patent term adjustment: Wyeth… [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:42 pm by Simon Gibbs
Section 29 is specific and has been interpreted by the Court of Appeal in Callery v Gray. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” Ropes & Gray offers a video discussion of two patent cases that will be argued in the December session, Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm by Nathan Dorn
Boston, Hilliard, Gray, and Company, 1833. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(IP Think Tank) Pope Benedict VI on patents (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Patently-O) (I/P Updates Updates) (IAM) (The IP Factor) Do patents really promote useful progress? [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Fogcutter Bar, 813 P.2d 660, 663-664 (Alaska 1991); Adkinson v. [read post]