Search for: "Parks v. Social Security Administration"
Results 141 - 160
of 236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2022, 5:55 am
In Ileto v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
A little spice was added by the indulgence in the rhetoric of setting up of improbable targets followed by solemn pledges of defense (social security and medicare for example). [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 10:45 am
Note that the 2007 decision in Moore v. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Sullivan was on brief, for appellee Federal Transit Administration. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:46 am
., et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
As the Court observed in the famous New York Times v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:35 am
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for the Social Security Administration. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:31 am
This case is a good example of how an efficient, economical and effective compliance application can deal with anti-social behaviour by problem unit owners. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
United States Netflix has won a defamation case for the show When They See Us, which tells the story of the Central Park Five. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am
Some social media commentators advocated various ecclesiastical sanctions against members of the group, whilst others considered the more general issue of climate protesting clergy. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Berryhill, 17-1606, presents a question only a lawyer could love: whether a decision by the Social Security Administration’s “Appeals Council” — the body that hears disability benefits claimants’ appeals from administrative law judge decisions — that the claimant’s appeal was untimely is a “final decision” subject to judicial review. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:35 pm
" I am fairly certain that social media, in general, brings out the absolute worst in a person. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
Administrative authority is then vested in the organs of state which accept the leadership of the Party and its guidance in the governance of the nation. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am
Connelly, Jr.Connelly, William F., 1951-Lanham, Md. : Rowman & Littlefield, c2010.Constitutional LawKF4749 .K365 2010To secure the liberty of the people : James Madison's Bill of Rights and the Supreme Court's interpretation / Eric T. [read post]
