Search for: "People v Little"
Results 141 - 160
of 13,274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Marion County or Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:45 pm
But notice that the caption is "People v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 8:58 am
People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:51 pm
(Orin Kerr) UC Hastings professor Rory Little has written a response to my post on Fernandez v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 7:51 am
In the recent case of Murphy v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:36 am
That's a little bit different.There's also some great doctrinal stuff in the opinion about what you do with mixed-motive Batson challenges, particularly as applied to prospective gay jurors in a case like this one. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:58 pm
(The opinion is a little confusing in places because it talks about the defendant having killed "Darrington" -- meaning David Darrington -- even though the defendant's wife was also a Darrington: Traci Darrington.)You can understand why you might stab and kill your wife's ex-husband for reasons beyond those that might arise from being evicted.So maybe the lesson here is: Be careful if you're trying to evict your ex-wife and her current… [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm
It might be useful for the courts (or the Judicial Council) to actually spend some time and come up with a neat little "cheat sheet" that trial court judges can use for waivers like this. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
Ho-hum.It's nonetheless a little unusual in a couple of ways. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 12:54 pm
[with] a pack of Camel cigarettes," since kids that age obviously should not be chain-smoking like the victim here did, but in context, that's the least of the sorrows here.)But there's only a tiny bit of evidence that he actually was the one who killed her; a little of (maybe) his DNA on her belt buckle, and proof that he owned knives (Jessica was killed with one), but that's about it. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 11:01 am
Does it take a little more effort? [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:06 pm
On the "low level litigation" front, here's a neat little published opinion from the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:04 pm
But in the meantime, add this to the list of who's on one side and who's on the other.Plus, this case has a neat little twist that I haven't seen before. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:15 am
Disagreeing with Justice Rylaarsdam, and holding that appointed counsel should continue to file such briefs.Justice Aronson articulates his reasons for that conclusion a little differently than I did. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:26 pm
Fortunately, all that happened was that appellant was arrested and placed on probation.It's also a neat little appeal because it's one that's basically based on a law review article: Northrop & Rosen's piece entitled “Kids Will be Kids: Time for a ‘Reasonable Child’ Standard for the Proof of Objective Mens Rea Elements. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:04 am
Especially since he says -- quite credibly -- that since he only had eight months on his sentence, there was no way he'd be so stupid as to jeopardize that status for a little weed.Which makes sense. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 1:01 pm
Because, amongst other consequence, a certificate of rehabilitation relieves them from the lifetime requirement of registering as a sex offender.But California law has a neat little twist. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:15 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:26 am
She likely charged hundreds if not thousands of people with that charge. [read post]
