Search for: "People v Steven A. Domin"
Results 141 - 160
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Powell v. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 11:19 am
After all, the background of Marbury v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Brownshirts dominated the political discussion and intimidated opponents 60 years ago. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
To take one example: many people have tried to explain to me how holding companies work, but Mark, at page 970, is the only person who has succeeded. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
If the prediction turns out to be true that June 1 is the drop-dead date, then June 2 would simply be the first day on which people could file suit to stop the President from doing what had previously been merely hypothetical. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
RSC spokesman Brian Staessle remarked upon retracting the brief that ”we hope people will now use this opportunity to engage in polite and serious discussion of copyright law. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
An approach more aware of regular people’s concerns must therefore come from the agencies and their work in the courts. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Less broadly, Justice John Paul Stevens infamously “failed the First Amendment” with his dissenting 1989 vote that would have allowed governments to ban flag burning, a view that he did not change in subsequent years.The point is that finding exceptions to rules does not mean that there are no rules. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm
A review of Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, How Democracies Die (Crown, 2018). *** I What does the twilight of modern democracy look like? [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
“Predictions about the future might appear to be difficult, but Niels Bohr, and perhaps three other influential people, might have been astonished to learn we have been fortunate to compile a long list of rather pragmatic predictions for the legal industry in 2015. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
The Federation and the LänderArticle 20 [Constitutional principles – Right of resistance](1) The Federal Republic of Germany is a democratic and social federal state.(2) All state authority is derived from the people. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:00 pm
Several people who read my submitted statement found Michael’s material as fascinating as I did, so I have added it to my less-than-five-minute opener. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Van Orden v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
That movement recognised and recognises that women needed to be equal with men, and that part of the problem of men’s domination of women was men’s violence to women. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Sherwin, Wallace Stevens Professor of Law, Director of the Visual Persuasion Project, New York Law School -- Law in the Shadow of Violence: The Riddle and the Paradox of Sovereignty W. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 5:42 pm
[A] decidedly anti-patent core nucleus from the Douglas era is reforming at the Court that - save for Justice Stevens - had disappeared in the wake of the 1980 Chakrabarty and 1981 Diehr decisions . . . . [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
That could also address some of the Article III standing issues I’ve been encouraging people to raise. [read post]
