Search for: "People v. Brown (1980)" Results 141 - 160 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
” [emphasis added]—John Irwin, Prisons in Turmoil (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co., 1980)“In Furman v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980), the Supreme Court considered a statute that generally prohibited the picketing of residences, but exempted labor picketing. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:23 pm by Ilya Somin
They argue that this divide is exemplified by the the Supreme Court’s decision in NFIB v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm by Andrew Langille
Tuttle (c.o.b. 800 Ranch), (1980) 14 C.C.L.T. 115.What Should I do if my Human Right Have Been Violated? [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am by Roger Pilon
In this context, the most important test of the judicial restraint that flowed from the New Deal came, of course, in Brown v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
The “tort deform” juggernaut gathered steam in the 1980s as a peculiar phenomenon began to emerge. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
Brown, 389 So. 2d 48, 51 (La. 1980) (finding that such a situation offends the conscience and concluding that “the ‘unknowing’ possession of a dangerous drug cannot be made criminal”). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Brown, 389 So. 2d 48, 51 (La. 1980) (concluding drug possession cannot be a strict liability crime because it would impermissibly criminalize unknowing possession of a controlled substance and permit a person to be convicted “without ever being aware of the nature of the substance he was given. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
This sort of question received a flurry of attention in the 1980s, perhaps in the expectation that it would soon be a hot issue, and sporadic attention since. [read post]