Search for: "People v. Childs (1991)" Results 141 - 160 of 296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
A defendant need not commit an affirmative act directed at a child (see People v Hitchcock, 98 NY2d 586, 591 [2002]; People v Johnson, 95 NY2d 368, 371-372 [2002]) nor cause actual harm to a child (see Johnson, 95 NY2d at 371; see also People v Duenas, 190 Misc 2d 801 [App Term, 2d Dept 2002]) to be guilty of Endangering the Welfare of a Child. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A defendant need not commit an affirmative act directed at a child (see People v Hitchcock, 98 NY2d 586, 591 [2002]; People v Johnson, 95 NY2d 368, 371-372 [2002]) nor cause actual harm to a child (see Johnson, 95 NY2d at 371; see also People v Duenas, 190 Misc 2d 801 [App Term, 2d Dept 2002]) to be guilty of Endangering the Welfare of a Child. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
” When my U.S. history class studied Miranda v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:38 am
Nunez, 167 Ariz. 272, 806 P.2d 861 (ArizonaSupreme Court 1991).State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:17 am by Michael Lowe
Here in Dallas, there has been a public awareness campaign to educate people about the expanded definition of sex crimes by the State of Texas. [read post]